For legal teams
Your agreements already contain the answer. Finding it shouldn't take a weekend.
Clarilytic reads contracts, amendments, filings and opinions together — not one file at a time — and connects the parties, clauses, obligations and deadlines inside them. Ask what falls due, what departs from your standard, or what the terms actually are after three amendments, and the answer opens the clause it rests on.
Invite-only pilot · Runs on the agreements you already have
Eight questions, eight answers
The questions that cost a junior associate a weekend.
Each answer below cites the agreement and clause it came from, so you can check it in one click.
Every agreement in force for one client, amendments included.
Fictional agreements, real questions — these are the analyses the built-in legal setup is designed to run.
What it reads
Everything in the file, read together.
Point it at a matter or a portfolio. It reads what's there — including the amendments everyone forgets — and builds the connections between them, so a question about obligations doesn't depend on someone remembering which agreement they live in.
The documents
- Contracts MSAs, NDAs, SOWs, employment and lease agreements — and their amendments
- Litigation filings complaints, motions, briefs, answers
- Case law court opinions, orders, judgments
- Regulatory filings submissions and compliance filings
- Corporate governance bylaws, board minutes, cap tables
- Legal memos advisory memos and opinion letters
- Patents granted patents and pending applications
What it connects
- the parties, under every name they use
- clauses, and the obligations and rights they create
- who owes what, to whom, and by when
- amendment and supersession chains, in order
- defined terms, and where they are defined
- courts, judges, counsel and jurisdictions
- statutes and the precedents a filing cites
- which parties are adverse, and which are aligned
Who it's for
Three jobs, one set of documents.
In-house counsel
You own more agreements than you can re-read. Ask what renews, what auto-renews silently, which obligations land on your team this quarter, and which agreements a change of control would stall.
Litigation teams
A file arrives as thousands of pages. Build the timeline, find where the accounts disagree, and check which authorities in the other side's brief are weakened by later decisions in the same matter.
Deal and transactional teams
A data room, a deadline, and a diligence list. Work out the net effective terms after every amendment, find the consents a close depends on, and hand the client a report that cites its own sources.
Ready on day one
Set up for this work before you start.
Nothing to configure first. The legal setup ships with the assistants, checklists and workspace layouts below, and you can change any of them or write your own.
Assistants
- @legal-contract Contract Analyst Terms, clauses, obligations, rights and defined terms across agreements
- @legal-clause Clause Comparator Compares clauses against your standard and flags what deviates
- @legal-deadline Obligation & Deadline Tracker Obligations, deadlines and the party responsible, across everything in force
- @legal-redline Redline/Diff Agent Walks the amendment chain and reconstructs the net effective terms
- @legal-risk Risk Scorer Scores a contract or matter from clause deviations, obligations and exposures
- @legal-conflict Conflict-Check Agent Finds parties adverse in one matter and aligned in another
- @legal-litigation Litigation Researcher Filings, precedents and statutes, pulled together with the evidence for each
Checklists
Items tick themselves off as the documents arrive.
Workspace layouts
A folder structure to start from, not a blank page.
Every time, the same way
NDAs drafted in your positions and checked against your playbook.
The same reading can run as a standing route instead of a one-off question. Give a kind of document a route — who drafts, which assistants check it, who approves — and every one that goes through it follows the same path — and the route keeps time, so you can see how long a review or a draft takes and which step it waits at.
- Reviewers see what changed since the last round, with the assistants' findings next to each section.
- Suggested wording applies in one click, and every version is kept in the workspace.
- Use it inside something bigger: vendor onboarding can start the NDA as one of its steps and wait for it to finish.
- Done: Start form form Counterparty, purpose and term
- Done: Draft draft From your NDA template, in your house style
- Done: Contract assistants review assistant Findings against your playbook, section by section
- Done: Legal review people Approved after one round of suggested wording
- In progress: Wait for the countersigned copy wait Up to 14 days, then a follow-up path
- Still to come: Tick the deal checklist checklist “Signed NDA” checked off in the deal's workspace
Why you can rely on it
Trust isn't a promise. It's a citation.
Answers you can check
Answers are grounded in your documents: numbered citations open the exact source passage they drew on, so you can check them. When Clarilytic is less confident about something it pulled out, the item is flagged for human review. You can also open a step-by-step trace of how any document was processed.
Your data, kept apart
Your documents and findings live in storage separated from every other customer's, encrypted in transit and at rest, with role-based access and a full audit log. Deleted means deleted — trash, then gone on request.
How your data is handled →What it's not good at
Honesty over polish: handwriting and poor-quality scans can defeat it — readable text matters. It won't give legal or financial advice; it shows you what your documents say. And it can't answer from documents you haven't given it — it draws only on your files and cites the passages it used.
Questions legal teams ask first.
Is this legal advice?
No. Clarilytic reads the documents you give it and shows you where each answer comes from — the agreement, the clause, the filing. The judgement, and the advice, stay with you.
How do I know an answer is right?
Every answer cites the passages it used, and one click opens the source at that passage. When it isn't sure about something it pulled out, it flags that for review instead of guessing.
Can one matter be kept away from another?
Yes. Work is separated by workspace, shared explicitly, and team roles decide who can do what. A guest sees only what was shared with them. The details are on the Trust page.
Are our documents used to train anything?
No. Your documents are used to answer your questions and nothing else — not to train systems for other customers, not for advertising.
What about scanned exhibits and old paper?
Scans are read as text where the scan allows it. A poor scan can defeat it, and it will say so rather than guess at what a page says.
Can we work from our own templates and standards?
Yes. Show it your past agreements and it drafts the next one in your structure and wording, exporting to Word in your own template. Your standard terms are what clause comparison measures against.
Bring the matter you're dreading.
Clarilytic is in an invite-only pilot. Tell us what you're working with — a portfolio, a data room, a case file — and run it on your own documents.